Samsung Galaxy A52 (6GB + 128GB) Bewertung | 197 Daten im Vergleich

The 3G.co.uk review highlights the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G as a strong mid-range contender, featuring a vibrant 6.5-inch 120Hz Super AMOLED display, a versatile 64MP quad-camera with OIS, and durable IP67 water resistance. It distinguishes itself by retaining functional features often missing in higher-end models, including a 3.5mm headphone jack, microSD storage expansion, and reliable all-day battery life, despite the included 15W charger being slower than the supported 25W capacity. While praised for its value, the device faces minor criticisms regarding its plastic build, thicker bezels, and an occasionally sluggish in-screen fingerprint sensor.

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is characterized by Expert Reviews as an exceptional mid-range smartphone, offering high-end features like 5G connectivity, a 120Hz Super AMOLED display, and an IP67 rating at a competitive price point. Powered by the Snapdragon 750G chipset, it provides significant performance upgrades over its predecessor, alongside a versatile 64MP camera with optical image stabilization. While praised for its 18-hour-plus battery life and, the device, however, uses a plastic build, lacks wireless charging, and does not feature a dedicated telephoto camera lens.

The SamMobile review highlights the Samsung Galaxy A52 as a top-tier mid-range device that bridges the gap to flagship performance by incorporating premium features like IP67 water resistance, stereo speakers, and a Snapdragon processor, which ensures smooth performance. Key strengths include a highly responsive 90Hz AMOLED display and a versatile 64MP main camera equipped with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for improved photo stability. Additionally, the 4,500 mAh battery provides exceptional, long-lasting power for diverse usage patterns. However, the review notes some drawbacks, specifically the inclusion of a less useful 5MP macro lens rather than a telephoto zoom, and the fact that only a 15W charger is included despite supporting 25W fast charging. Other minor limitations include speakers that could be louder and a hybrid SIM slot that limits storage expansion options.

The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a strong mid-range contender offering premium features like a 120Hz AMOLED display and IP67 water resistance for under $500. Key pros include a versatile 64MP main camera, long-lasting battery life of over 12 hours, and a distinctive design. However, the device has cons, including photo quality that trails the Pixel 4a 5G and a macro lens with limited functionality. While the Snapdragon 750G processor is solid, it is significantly slower than competitor chips. Tom's GuideAdditional drawbacks include a screen that scratches easily, only a 15W charger included despite 25W support, lack of wireless charging, and significant pre-installed bloatware.

CNET reviewed the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G as a strong contender under $500, balancing flagship features like a 120Hz AMOLED display and IP67 water resistance with a mid-range price. Key pros include its durable design, optical image stabilization in the main camera, and generous software support, while retaining a headphone jack and expandable storage. However, the review notes significant cons such as sluggish performance from the Snapdragon 750G processor, a slow and inconsistent fingerprint sensor, mediocre supplementary cameras, and plastic back prone to smudges.

PCMag reviewed the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, noting its durable design with IP67 water resistance, a vibrant 6.5-inch 120Hz Super AMOLED display, and all-day battery life as significant advantages. The phone also includes a 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable storage, along with a promise of multi-year OS and security updates. However, the review highlights drawbacks such as sluggish performance compared to rivals, a slow and inaccurate fingerprint sensor, and a camera that falls short of competitors like the Google Pixel 4a 5G in low light and overall quality.

Wired reviewed the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G as a good mid-range phone with a vibrant 120Hz Super AMOLED display, durable IP67 design, and large battery, plus it retains a headphone jack and MicroSD slot. A significant pro is Samsung's commitment to three years of OS upgrades and four years of security updates. Cons include performance issues like stuttering and lag despite the Snapdragon 750G chip, a camera that produces oversaturated and less detailed photos than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, a slow fingerprint sensor, and preinstalled bloatware.

TechRadar describes the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G as a solid mid-range phone offering good value, though its high-end specs may not impress. Its pros include a 120Hz Super AMOLED display, IP67 water and dust resistance, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and expandable storage. Cons include a plastic rear panel, a sometimes slow in-screen fingerprint sensor, a mid-range processor that can be sluggish with demanding tasks, and camera performance that is outclassed by competitors like the Google Pixel 4a in low light.

The Tech Advisor review highlights the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G as a mid-range phone excelling in details, offering a complete package for its price. Strengths include an excellent 6.5-inch 120Hz Super AMOLED display, solid build quality with an IP67 rating, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a capable 64MP main camera with OIS. However, the review notes some drawbacks, such as superfluous 5MP macro and depth sensors, slow 15W charging, and performance limitations with demanding games. The in-display fingerprint sensor is also described as unreliable. Despite rivals potentially offering more power, the A52 5G is considered a safe choice, supported by a promise of four years of security updates.

Android Central describes the Samsung Galaxy A52 as a standout budget phone offering "flagship-tier" features at a mid-range price, including a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED 90Hz display and IP67 water/dust resistance. While it provides reliable all-day battery life, a strong 64MP main camera, and a commitment to three generations of Android updates, drawbacks include a slow in-screen fingerprint sensor, mediocre macro/depth lenses, occasional performance stutter, a bundled 15W charger instead of 25W, and pre-installed bloatware.