AMD Pro A10 8850B Bewertung | 78 Daten im Vergleich

The Intel Core i5-6500 significantly outperforms the AMD PRO A10-8850B, delivering roughly 50% higher overall PassMark scores and 30% better single-threaded performance due to its advanced 14nm architecture. While the AMD chip boasts higher clock speeds (3.9/4.1 GHz) and faster integrated graphics, its 28nm design results in a 95W TDP, making it less energy-efficient than the 65W i5-6500. Ultimately, the i5-6500 is the superior choice, offering DDR4 support and higher IPC, whereas the AMD option is hindered by aging architecture and lack of modern memory support. For the full comparison, visit PassMark.

The AMD PRO A10-8850B outperforms the AMD A10-8750 by roughly 17% in multi-threaded benchmarks, driven by higher 3.9 GHz base clocks, despite both using the Socket FM2+ architecture. The A10-8850B offers superior performance and slightly faster integrated graphics, while the A10-8750 holds a significant advantage in efficiency with a lower 65W TDP compared to the 95W of the 8850B. Both chips are locked, rely on older DDR3 memory, and are best suited for budget office tasks. Detailed benchmarks are available at PassMark Software. Copy

The AMD PRO A10-8850B (Q1 2016) offers superior performance over the AMD A8-7600 APU (Q3 2014), featuring roughly 17% faster multi-threaded and 12% faster single-thread performance. The A10-8850B boasts higher clock speeds (3.9 GHz base/4.1 GHz turbo) and faster integrated Radeon R7 graphics (800 MHz) compared to the A8-7600's 3.1 GHz base and 720 MHz graphics. However, the A10-8850B has a 95W TDP, resulting in a 38% higher power consumption and increased thermal output compared to the 65W A8-7600. While the A10-8850B is better for performance, the A8-7600 is superior for energy-efficient, low-power builds. For the full comparison, visit cpubenchmark.net. Copy