AMD A10 5700 Bewertung | 78 Daten im Vergleich

This Tom's Hardware review explores building a fanless (0 dB) gaming PC, utilizing AMD Trinity APUs to achieve silent operation without active cooling. Pros include achieving a truly silent, small-form-factor build using energy-efficient components, while cons involve high thermal sensitivity where the A10-5700 pushes limits and requires strict ambient temperature control. The analysis highlights that while AMD APUs offer good integrated graphics, Intel CPUs paired with passively-cooled dedicated cards provide superior efficiency and performance. Conversely, the review identifies AMD's "Dual Graphics" as a major con, labeling it inefficient and problematic for this type of system. Assembly requires precision, as the build demands large, heavy heatsinks that risk motherboard warping, despite the advantage of a roomy, effective chassis for heat dissipation.

The Guru3D review of the AMD A10-5700 "Trinity" APU highlights it as a 65W TDP, energy-efficient alternative to the unlocked 100W A10-5800K, featuring Piledriver architecture with a 3.4 GHz base clock and Turbo Core 3.0 up to 4.0 GHz. It retains the robust Radeon HD 7660D integrated graphics (384 shaders at 800 MHz), positioning it as an ideal, low-power solution for HTPCs and small form factor systems. Key pros include excellent multimedia capabilities via the UVD3 engine and superior integrated gaming performance compared to Intel counterparts, specifically in benchmarks like Far Cry 2. Furthermore, the APU demonstrates high power efficiency, with the system idling at 35W and peaking around 100-110W under load. Cons focus on the locked multiplier (non-K), which restricts overclocking, and disappointing CPU performance gains over previous generations, leaving it trailing Intel Core i3 and i5 processors. Additionally, despite impressive integrated graphics, it still cannot handle modern DirectX 11 titles at high settings without a dedicated card.

The AMD A10-5700 Trinity desktop APU is positioned as a power-efficient, 65W TDP, budget-friendly alternative to the A10-5800K, offering strong integrated Radeon HD 7660D graphics performance at a lower 3.4GHz base clock. While delivering solid entry-level gaming, including support for Dual Graphics with a Radeon HD 6670, the processor's Piledriver architecture and locked multiplier limit its raw compute performance and overclocking potential compared to higher-end models. Ultimately, the review finds the 5700 ideal for budget builds needing capable integrated graphics but notes the reliance on older, legacy cards for the Dual Graphics feature. HardwareZone

The HEXUS review describes the AMD A10-5700 as an efficient, 65W "fit-and-forget" alternative to the A10-5800K, utilizing the quad-core "Piledriver" architecture with a 4.0GHz Turbo speed. It is positioned as ideal for small form factor (SFF) or home theatre PC (HTPC) builds, offering 80–90% of the performance of its faster sibling while maintaining quiet, cool operation. While featuring superior Radeon HD 7660D integrated graphics that outperform Intel Core i3 rivals, the review highlights limited overclocking due to a locked multiplier and weak single-threaded performance.

The AMD A10-5700 is a 65W TDP Socket FM2 desktop processor designed to deliver capable multi-threaded performance alongside low power consumption for HTPC setups. It operates at 3.4 GHz with a 4.0 GHz boost and features integrated Radeon HD 7660D graphics, which constitute a primary strength for budget, media-focused builds. However, the lack of an L3 cache hinders gaming performance, resulting in lower benchmarks compared to competition like the FX-4300, and it is not suited for serious gaming. While offering Hybrid Crossfire capability, the platform faces criticism for limited future upgrade paths. Ultimately, the processor serves as an efficient solution for specialized, compact systems rather than a general-purpose, high-performance computing option.

The Vortez review of the AMD A10-5800K and A10-5700 "Trinity" APUs highlights a significant leap in integrated graphics performance, with the Radeon HD 7660D providing a 25–45% increase over previous generations. The 100W A10-5800K ("Black Edition") serves as a high-performance option for budget gaming, while the 65W A10-5700 focuses on energy efficiency for HTPCs. Pros include exceptional graphics performance that makes low-end discrete cards obsolete and great value, though the Piledriver CPU cores show only modest improvements in raw processing power. While the A10-5800K earns a Gold Award for versatility, the A10-5700's price point is noted to be very close to its faster counterpart, and both face stiff competition in CPU-heavy tasks.